The rapid rise of digital insurance platforms in India has created enormous opportunity, but it has also created persistent confusion about roles, permissions, and regulatory boundaries. One of the most common and costly misconceptions is the belief that web aggregators can legally sell insurance policies. The short answer is no, but the longer answer contains important nuances that directly affect how aggregator businesses should be designed, how their technology stacks must function, and how their revenue models should be structured. Web aggregators are licensed by IRDAI under the Insurance Web Aggregators Regulations with a very specific mandate. Their role is informational and facilitative. They exist to bring transparency to the market by displaying and comparing insurance products, enabling customers to understand features, pricing, and coverage options in a standardized manner, and then redirecting customers to insurers or appropriately licensed intermediaries for transaction execution. This distinction is not semantic. It is foundational. IRDAI deliberately separates comparison from selling to ensure that advice, solicitation, and transactional activities are carried out only by entities that meet higher licensing, training, and compliance standards. When aggregators cross this line, even unintentionally, they expose themselves to regulatory scrutiny, penalties, and in extreme cases, license cancellation. More importantly, they undermine the regulator’s core objective of protecting customers by ensuring that purchase decisions are influenced only by licensed and accountable intermediaries.
-
Web aggregators cannot solicit, negotiate, advise, or issue policies, and they cannot collect premiums in their own capacity.
-
Selling insurance is permitted only to licensed entities such as insurance agents, corporate agents, and insurance distributors.
-
Any activity that influences a customer’s purchase decision beyond factual, standardized information can be interpreted as selling.
Understanding what constitutes “selling” is critical. Under IRDAI’s interpretation, selling is not limited to issuing a policy or collecting payment. It also includes advising customers on product suitability, nudging them toward specific insurers, highlighting one product as “best” or “recommended,” negotiating terms, or controlling the end-to-end purchase journey in a way that removes the licensed intermediary from the center of the transaction. Many compliance failures originate not from overt violations but from subtle design choices. For example, embedding persuasive sales language inside comparison pages, designing funnels where the aggregator brand appears to be the seller, or routing payments through aggregator-controlled systems can all be viewed as crossing regulatory boundaries. These mistakes are often amplified by technology. Once such flows are coded into a platform, every transaction repeats the same violation at scale. This is why compliance in the aggregator model is not only a legal issue. It is a system design issue. Technology architecture must reflect regulatory intent. There must be a clear, enforced separation between the aggregator’s comparison journey and the licensed entity’s sales journey. When a customer decides to proceed, the handoff must be explicit, transparent, and technically real, not just cosmetic.
-
Aggregators are allowed to display standardized product information, compare prices and features, generate leads, and redirect users.
-
Transactions must be executed by insurers or licensed intermediaries, not by the aggregator.
-
Disclosures about relationships, revenue models, and the nature of services must be clearly visible.
This separation is not unique to India. Globally, aggregator models operate under similar principles. Regulators in multiple jurisdictions insist on a strong firewall between comparison and advice. They mandate prominent disclosures so customers understand who is responsible for what. They increasingly expect technology-driven compliance, where systems themselves prevent role violations rather than relying solely on policies and training. India’s regulatory framework follows this same philosophy, adapted to local market realities. For Indian web aggregators, this means that long-term success depends less on how aggressively they push conversion and more on how thoughtfully they design compliant ecosystems. Technology platforms play a decisive role here. Purpose-built insurtech platforms can enforce role-based access, ensure that only licensed users can perform regulated actions, block unauthorized workflows, and maintain comprehensive audit trails. They can design journeys where aggregators focus purely on comparison and education, while licensed partners handle solicitation, advice, and issuance. This architecture protects all stakeholders. Aggregators reduce regulatory risk. Insurers gain confidence that their distribution partners operate within bounds. Regulators see consistent, auditable behavior. Customers receive clarity about who is responsible for advice and service.
-
Compliance-first system design prevents accidental violations at scale.
-
Controlled integrations ensure that licensed entities, not aggregators, execute sales.
-
Audit-ready records demonstrate adherence during regulatory reviews.
Treating compliance as a strategic design choice rather than a legal afterthought changes the trajectory of aggregator businesses. Instead of constantly worrying about what is permitted, teams operate inside clearly defined, system-enforced boundaries. This creates space for innovation in user experience, data analytics, personalization of comparisons, and education, without drifting into prohibited territory. Over time, compliance becomes a trust signal. Insurers prefer to partner with platforms that demonstrate strong governance. Regulators develop confidence in platforms that consistently respect boundaries. Customers feel safer when roles are transparent. All of this contributes to sustainable growth. Web aggregators cannot legally sell insurance in India, but they remain indispensable to the ecosystem. They are the transparency layer. They are the discovery engine. They are the starting point of the customer journey. When they embrace this role fully, supported by compliant technology and clear operational discipline, they unlock a powerful, scalable, and regulator-friendly business model. In a tightly regulated industry like insurance, clarity is not just helpful. It is the foundation on which durable digital businesses are built.
